A comparison of the growth performance between cattle reared in conventional systems and in feral condition
Type
article
Creator
Publisher
Identifier
Sergio Nogales, Juan Calderón, Teresa Marta Lupi, Maria Cristina Bressan, Juan Vicente Delgado, María Esperanza Camacho, A comparison of the growth performance between cattle reared in conventional systems and in feral conditions, In Livestock Science, Volume 206, 2017, Pages 154-160, ISSN 1871-1413, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.10.026.
Title
A comparison of the growth performance between cattle reared in conventional systems and in feral condition
Subject
Natural growth
Non-linear models
Biological growth curve
Commercial growth curve
Non-linear models
Biological growth curve
Commercial growth curve
Date
2017-11-30T19:29:10Z
2017-11-30T19:29:10Z
2017
2017-11-30T19:29:10Z
2017
Description
Feral and conventional growth performances were compared using Marismeña cattle as a model. Marismeña calves are commonly reared under feral conditions in one of the most important reserves of Europe (Doñana National Park, Spain). Data recording in these natural conditions faces compromises as animals are only handled once per year. This fact has to be saved to obtain efficient estimations for the biological growth curve of cattle reared under feral conditions. On the one hand, we assessed the inference of the theoretical influence of human management on cattle growth. On the other hand, we studied the fitness of the best growth curve, in both feral and conventional systems to use the physiological meaning of the parameters obtained from their study as selection criteria related to the adaptability of potential breeding males and females. Fitting of Brody's, von Bertalanffy, Verhulst, logistic, Gompertz and Richards’ models was tested as these models are the most representative ones for cattle growth. In general, Brody's and Richards’ models presented the best fitting values for the biological curve. According to the biological curve parameters, males and females presented asymptotic weights of 641.71 kg and 403.55 kg, respectively. As expected, the results of the commercial growth curve severely differed from those of the biological curve. The best fitting biological curve was not representative for cattle reared under commercial conditions. The logistic model was the best fitting one for feral females, Gompertz model for feral males, and Verhulst for intensive males and females, respectively. Seasonal oscillations in feeding may be responsible for the earlier achievement of the best performance in feral cattle (7 and 10 months for males and females, respectively), while such best performances were reached at 11 months in intensive calves, what becomes relevant for management and slaughtering decision-making. The study of the biological curve in Marismeña feral breed is very illustrative as this is the first time that feral cattle's growth is approached. Knowledge on the biological growth curve parameters could be used to interpret the strong relation between feral animals and their environment. This research could infer a model to quantify the effects of human management on livestock development, as feral resources offer unique opportunities to study domestic livestock without any human influence.
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Access restrictions
openAccess
Language
eng
Comments
